THE
BACKGROUND
The treatment of the burn-injured
person changed very little historically until this century. The
Second World War and later the war in Viet Nam gave impetus to improvement.
In WW II, the experience of surgeons in Britain, when so many air
personnel were burned, resulted in studies that promoted new understanding
and treatment. Four Plastic Surgery Units were established in Britain
to meet the demand, with one surgeon at the Queen Victoria Hospital
in East Grinstead, Sussex, doing more than any other to promote
both early treatment and rehabilitation. Sir Archibald McIndoe was
acknowledged as a superior technician, but more than that, he was
an innovator. He popularized the saline tank for treatment, and
developed many surgical techniques for the burned face and hand;
yet he also understood the need for long-term rehabilitation as
opposed to purely surgical repair.
East Grinstead was an ideally
chosen location for treating these large numbers of burn victims,
as the pleasant country surroundings, a world away from the bombed
cities and industrial areas, lent it to the long term rehabilitation
required. Indeed, part of the patient's treatment was to face the
outside community in shops, cinema etc. and here the small market
town played a major role by readily accepting the many patients
who were so badly deformed.
The American experience during
the Viet Nam war added even more to the knowledge and understanding
of the burn injury, particularly when large numbers of patients
were involved and equipment and facilities were strained. Most of
the knowledge gained, was learned from thermal burns but the treatment
of chemical, electrical and radiation burns also benefited since
they all have some common characteristics.
Prior to the 1960's, burn
injuries were treated throughout Canada, and in fact the world,
on general surgical and occasionally medical wards, alongside all
other injuries and illnesses. Sometimes patients were even assigned
to isolation wards where they were treated amongst extremely infectious
patients, the rationale being, that all burn patients inevitably
became infected and were therefore a hazard to others. In the evolution
of treatment approaching the 1960's, this understanding changed
and there was recognition that the burn patient did not necessarily
need to become infected and in fact, they were the ones needing
protection. Only later was it further appreciated that one common
source of patient infection was the patient's own organisms. In
the meantime, separation of the particularly vulnerable burn-injured
from the rest of the hospital population was introduced, using private
or even corner rooms, where a certain amount of traffic control
could be achieved.
From that point, it was a
minor step to advocate a separate ward for this injury, namely a
Burn Unit, with a dedicated staff as well as environmental control.
(In this context, "dedicated" refers not just to motivation,
but also to a staff who have specialized training in Burn Care and
confine themselves to treating these patients.) This was a major
advance and probably accounts for more of the progress in the treatment
of burns than any other single item, including all the support technology
and antibiotics. Unfortunately, in the Third World this understanding
and the many other improvements seen in this century have yet to
be achieved. In fact, over the last 20 years, one has had to travel
well outside the Western World to see examples of the type of burn
complications which were once commonplace here.
VICTORIA:
BEFORE THE BURN UNIT
With the help of others, and
particularly Dr. Embert Van Tilburg, Mrs. Ethel Jordan, Mrs. Bea
Sinclair, and Ms. Kathie Johnson, I will relate the essential facts
regarding our present Burn Unit.
It was in England, in East
Grinstead, long after the war where I met Alastair Baird and where
we finished our training together before returning to Canada to
practice. He went to Winnipeg and I came to Victoria in 1962. I
was then the only Plastic Surgeon on Vancouver Island until 1969
when Dr. Baird joined me in practice. Dr. John Wellman joined us
on the staff in1970. The first Head Nurse through this difficult
pre-Burn Unit period, was Mrs. Ethel Jordan who continued on when
the Burn Unit first opened. She was Head Nurse of Ward 3C-East at
St. Joseph's Hospital in Victoria, where burn-related adults were
admitted during the 1960's. (Children were treated on the pediatric
ward.)
Mrs. Jordan vividly remembers
a time "when we worked in the crudest of pre-Burn Unit environments
She states that "the patients were treated in a private room
on Ward 3C-East - no screens and no sinks, so we had basins of water
to wash our hands. I remember the first burn patient we had - he
had 60% of his body burnt - 1st, 2nd, and 3rd degree burns. Our
knowledge of nursing burn patients was very limited. We did the
best we knew how - basically following Dr.'s orders - but it was
not enough to save the patient".
Mrs. Jordan's recollections
include the advent of silver nitrate compresses for dressings. It
had been discovered that gram-negative organisms were particularly
sensitive to silver nitrate. Later this was incorporated into creams,
but originally a very messy dressing procedure was involved, which
resulted in the silver solution of the compresses staining everything
black. One patient, presumably establishing an independence not
otherwise available, took to throwing the compresses about the room
spattering walls, floor, furniture, not to mention innocent nurses,
coloring all with a splashy black decoration. Not only the staff
but also the Laundry Department complained mightily, and one result
was that the linen for such patients was kept separate from the
linen used for the rest of the Hospital. One of the measures taken
by the nurses to protect themselves from the discoloration of their
clothing was that of winding perforated naso-gastric tubes into
the dressings. The silver nitrate solution could then be flushed
through the tube and would keep the compresses moist without necessitating
such frequent dressing changes.
She goes on to say "we
learned from our experiences, daily. As well, we attended courses
and perhaps increased our reading of contemporary scientific literature."
I was no exception, and learned lessons continually in this atmosphere.
For instance, I had read about people who were unable to sweat after
very extensive skin grafting but it took me some time to appreciate
the symptoms a patient complained of long after he was discharged
and attempting to work, namely: dizziness, marked suffering of heat
and headaches accompanying exertion of any sort. He had been so
badly burned and had required so much skin grafting, that as his
temperature rose his body was unable to respond normally (as grafts
do not sweat). There are many other such incidents, which the nurses
and I remember.
In order to introduce hydrotherapy
for the burned patient, use of the Hubbard tank in the Physiotherapy
Department three floors away, had to be scheduled. This was extremely
difficult, not only because of time constraints, but also the resistance
of some, because of the perceived potential contamination from burn
patients. Mrs. Jordan also recalls that transverse the distance
involved was both draughty and painful for the patients. Another
problem arose when our time honored and natural ventilation system
(of opening a window), had the unfortunate result of maggots being
found on a patient. This upset patient and staff alike. (Our aesthetic
sense does not usually allow the benefits offered by such crawlies
to be appreciated.) The fact is however that maggots only devour
dead tissue and if allowed, would clean up such a wound beautifully.
An occasional visit to the
morgue was not unusual in order to harvest homologous skin for grafting
the severely injured (which became a necessity, when a patient did
not have enough unburned donor surface him/herself). In those days
mortality rates quoted in the literature were very high by the standards
we know today. For instance, a third degree burn of over 40% of
the body area had associated with it a 50% mortality rate. Today,
this has been greatly reduced. Infection, the major cause of death
after a burn injury, could not be adequately controlled in the rudimentary
working surroundings that the nurses endured. They deserve credit
as well, for putting up with, what in retrospect, has to be seen
as crude treatment modalities. Pain was not as well controlled as
it is today, and consequently, both debriding (removing dead tissue/skin)
and dressing techniques were much more difficult. Because there
was no separate treatment room, which therefore necessitated changing
dressings in bed rooms, and because the exposure method of treatment
was being used more frequently, the rooms had to be kept very warm;
uncomfortably so for the staff. In spite of the difficulties, a
dedicated nucleus of nurses became expert in burn care, but it was
nonetheless becoming more and more apparent that a formal Burn Unit
was required.
continued...
|